• Home
  • CuriousCat Archive

CuriousCat Archive Page 144 of 202

Questions and Answers

  1. Published on Jan 26, 2020, 4:14 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    i guess that's not what you use CC for, but as you come to mind as resident Kentuck Route Zero enthusiast: would you recommend playing them episode by episode, or wait until all is complete (in 3 days time) and play through all at once?

    Ian replied:

    So, the thing is, I have played the games episode by episode as they've come out, and can't visit the alternate timeline where I play them all at once and see how the experience is different. As it is now, playing each Act in one afternoon with literal years between them is unique: each act starts to feel like a folk memory by the time I start the next one. I remember images, beats, individual characters, and some sense of what I was trying to do, but if, between Acts, they added an entirely new member to the cast and acted like they'd always been there, I'd probably go "yeah... I think I remember them." In a way that feeling really suits the digressive, tall tale vibe of the game, like the story your great uncle tells every time you see him but never tells quite the same way twice.

    I don't think that's something the designers originally intended, since they never planned KR0 to take a decade to finish. But either they've made it work with the themes or they've lucked into it, but I find it really remarkable.

    With four Acts finished and the fifth releasing imminently, that experience is impossible to recreate now, unless you decide, of your own volition to wait 1-4 years between each Act. So, at this point, you might as well play them all in a row. I think I'll do that as well once Act V is out, see what it's like when you actually remember everything going on. But it'll be like playing a different game.

    I really like Kentucky Route Zero.

  2. Published on Jan 26, 2020, 4:03 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    In the How To Radicalize A Normie video, I recognized Ian Miles Cheong as the "recidivist" but who was the person you said "might not be sincere" in turning from the alt-right? Thanks! (Also what exactly happened to make Cheong have that sudden dramatic 180 halfway through GG, was it really just because a feminist criticized a game he liked???? I feel like I've never seen the in-depth articles about it the way I have with, say, Laci Green)

    Ian replied:

    The "might not be sincere" guy was Baked Alaska, who made a public statement that he had left the Alt-Right and renounced his previous politics, but a lot of us were skeptical, and since then he's deleted the video and started turning up at Alt-Right rallies again.

    Cheong was a reactionary conservative before he was a progressive, so his 180 was more of a 360. His official story is that feminists criticized a game he liked and that sent him running from feminism, but I got the sense he was mostly looking for attention and found he could get it easiest from the Right.

  3. Published on Jan 26, 2020, 3:59 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Do you have anything to add to the discourse about Joe Rogan or would you agree with this take? https://twitter.com/PedanticRomantc/status/1220752264299601920

    Ian replied:

    Enh, yes and no? I do agree that bringing people like Rogan "into the fold" is part of the work, and him endorsing Bernie isn't necessarily a problem. I still think it was wrong for Bernie to publicly accept the endorsement, and shows that he either doesn't really understand how the Alt-Right operates or doesn't think it's as much of a problem as it is. That isn't strictly speaking *necessary* for him to grok as President - I don't think for a moment he would stand in the way of efforts to deal with the Alt-Right - but I would feel better if I felt he actually understood them, and it feeds into my concerns that he is primarily fighting the Far Right economically and not as strongly socially.

    Again, not strictly speaking an impediment, just something we'd have to deal with if he's elected.

  4. Published on Jan 25, 2020, 12:40 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Can you expand on your "capitalism is the product of bigotry" tweet and why you don't believe the reverse is true (if you do)? Is it kinda fair to say that both influence each other?

    Ian replied:

    So, in my Origins of Conservatism video, I talk about how capitalism - as we understand it today - came about as the successor-of-sorts to feudalism. (I'm not an economist nor a historian so I'm sure my shorthands here are butchering history, but we're speaking in broad strokes.) It has been used as a means of maintaining social hierarchies, stratifying society into a hierarchy with the rich at the top and the working class at the bottom.

    And we have an ancient history of stratifying societies in this way, often along lines of bigotry: whites at the top, other races at the bottom; men at the top, women at the bottom; straights at the top, all manner of queer folks at the bottom. Et cetera, et cetera.

    So I've been coming around to the feeling that capitalism is just another means of stratifying society the same way bigotry is, one of the most persistent because we've woven it so deeply into the fabric of society. But it's the same basic idea: the powerful finding systems for maintaining their power. It's the same mentality.

    It's more an idea I'm entertaining than one I'd go to the mat for, but it's at least more sensible than the reverse that gets bandied about in lefty spaces: that bigotry is a byproduct of capitalism. Bigotry predates capitalism by millennia.

    But you are absolutely correct that they reinforce each other. Bigotry is a tool of accumulating wealth, wealth is a tool of upholding bigotry.

  5. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 6:12 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Have you learned any language other than English?

    Ian replied:

    a tiny bit of Spanish

  6. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 6:12 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    It took me way too long to get the “monogamist ally” joke lol

    Ian replied:

    I had a very weird Twitter conversation with someone who clearly didn't get the joke.

  7. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 6:10 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Do you enjoy answering so many questions? Is it healthy?

    Ian replied:

    It's a platform that lets me hash out ideas in longer form than Twitter allows and it gets me talking about subjects that might not pop into my head on their own. I basically treat the questions as mini writing prompts.

    It can get a little unhealthy if I get really fixated on something and start arguing a lot with people, but it's usually a net gain.

  8. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 5:58 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Just to add onto this point, I think it's worth pointing out that, in the US, top marginal tax rates over 90% coexisted with Jim Crow laws for years. Class reductionism doesn't really have an answer to that unless you believe that codified institutional racism no longer exists & racism today is just the lingering effects of past racism being reinforced by class hierarchy.

    in response to What distinction are you drawing between economic and social issues? Issues like the climate crisis, Medicare For All, and student debt disproportionately impact the poor, and the poor are disproportionately composed of LGBTQ+ persons and people of color, so although Sanders may not be as serious about issues that more obviously and exclusively impact those minorities as Warren is, doesn't his stance on those economic issues make a stronger case to vote for him, since those issues effect everyone, gay or straight, white or black, or whatever? But maybe I'm just foolishly misinformed like all the rest of the bozos here. I dunno. Go on and yell at me.

    Ian replied:

    absolutely, though "class reductionism" has become a dirty phrase in lefty spaces thanks to establishment liberals using it to write of Sanders' entire platform, to the point where using it at all makes people immediately assume you're a shitlib

    makes it very difficult to talk about the very real streak of class reductionism present among Sanders supporters (and not entirely absent from his campaign rhetoric)

    it's shitty that people write off all the good positions he takes with that term, but I wish people would take the critique in better faith when it comes from other leftists

  9. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 4:39 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What compels you to make videos?

    Ian replied:

    it quiets the blood demon who lives in the wall

  10. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 4:39 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What distinction are you drawing between economic and social issues?

    Issues like the climate crisis, Medicare For All, and student debt disproportionately impact the poor, and the poor are disproportionately composed of LGBTQ+ persons and people of color, so although Sanders may not be as serious about issues that more obviously and exclusively impact those minorities as Warren is, doesn't his stance on those economic issues make a stronger case to vote for him, since those issues effect everyone, gay or straight, white or black, or whatever?

    But maybe I'm just foolishly misinformed like all the rest of the bozos here. I dunno. Go on and yell at me.

    Ian replied:

    (re: economic vs. social reform)

    OK, in the majority of US states, if you murder a trans woman you can get off scot-free by saying you panicked when you found out she was trans. That is legal precedent. It is essentially a license to murder trans woman.

    You cannot address that with a wealth tax.

    We have seen an absolutely shocking wave of police shootings of unarmed Black citizens over the last decade, and most of the cops responsible have faced no repercussions whatsoever. It is essentially a license to murder African-Americans.

    You cannot address that with a healthcare bill.

    I believe Bernie Sanders is a candidate who, if pressured by his constituency, would put forward stronger policies to combat these problems, and I get exasperated with his constituency because they fail to apply that pressure. Because they keep falling back on this "the best way to help minorities is economic reform" rhetoric.

    We are seeing a huge resurgence in white nationalism in this country and if your first line of defense against it is to rejigger our tax structure, that's a big problem.

  11. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 4:29 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Without knowing what it is, Review the next big Meme

    Ian replied:

    7/10

  12. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 4:29 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Here's a hot button Elizabeth Warren question for ya to get dragged big time dragged for answering: who would Liz pick in Mario Kart 64 and Mario Kart Double Dash respectively

    Ian replied:

    Toad and Birdetta

  13. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 3:16 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Do you think the fact that Warren chose to not endorse Sanders in 2016 is why she gets such a strong dislike from the Sanders campaign or do you think there is something deeper at play?

    Ian replied:

    no, in 2016 they all said "I'm not sexist against Hillary, I would happily vote for Liz" and we were all like "we'll see if you say that when Liz runs" and lo and behold

    (ugh, necessary nuance: I am being flip here, I don't believe that Bernie fans are driven primarily by sexism and I freely admit there are many extremely valid concerns about Liz, I merely point out that the tendency to exaggerate Bernie's strengths and readily believe falsehoods about Liz obviously has sexist components to it)

  14. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 3:12 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    He has probably been listening to hasan, kulinski and Vaush. They've been the ones pushing this crap. When people talk about bernie bros, those are the guys I think of.

    in response to Okay, okay, okay, fine, Ian, I didn't know all of this stuff, I didn't know people were misrepresenting Warren's history, I just didn't know, alright? I've just been repeating what people have said and what journalists and pundits who I've trusted in the past have said. You don't need to be so combative and hostile to everyone in your curiouscat who believes these misrepresentations; most of them share your values, and are just going by what they think they know to be true. You can't blame them for that.

    Ian replied:

    shocker

  15. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 3:11 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    I see weird takes about politicians motivations all the time on Twitter.

    Like right now there is a thread being spread by people I respect talking about how Obama doesn’t like a Bernie presidency because he’s “concerned about his legacy.”

    Why make up elaborate headcanon? What reason do we have to think that Obama isn’t speaking in good faith?

    I also can’t help but notice that minorities are more often the targets of these weird accusations than white dudes like Biden.

    in response to I've been disappointed recently by the anti-Bernie stance you've displayed recently on Twitter, especially because you are among my favorite leftist content creators. I even credit you for being the original push that radicalized me past standard liberalism. I'm really just looking for an explanation for this choice to fall into what I see as centrist liberal propaganda. I recognize you don't owe me one, but it would be appreciated. I have 2 big questions. 1) What is your reasoning for feeding into the "Bernie Bro" narrative? I take issue because not only does the term erase all the minority Bernie supporters, but it's also a narrative that is just blatantly false. I've seen much more harassment aimed at online Bernie supporters than the other way around, and then when the "Bros" respond (rather politely, often) they are blocked, and accused of harassing. And as to the point that white Bernie Bros lost HRC the 2016 election by voting for trump, stats show that more Clinton voters switched to McCain in 08 than Sanders to Trump in 16. He almost certainly should not be criticized for converting Rs to his camp. The whole Trump supporting Bro narrative just doesn't hold up. 2) What about Warren's policy makes her more attractive to you than Bernie's? She's weaker on M4A, wealth tax, public utilities, and has an absolutely horrid foreign policy platform, but she covers up for it with a lot of vague wordy statements that are characteristic of liberals pandering to left values. I really see her as an Obama 2.0 and that is not a compliment. Add in her troublesome past claiming to be a WoC, her previous Republican views, and her dishonesty with the recent "leaks" and all I see is an untrustworthy liberal candidate. I accept there is a possibility you're supporting her just due to your perception of Bernie's base, but I'm holding out hope that you're not that type of voter. Thanks for your time. Once again, not trying to be combative. Just asking.

    Ian replied:

    YUPPPPP

  16. Published on Jan 24, 2020, 3:11 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Can you really, though? When the political establishment and the mainstream media is waging information warfare against the public, and most people don't have the time or the energy left over to fact check the narratives they're being fed, can you really blame these people for unwittingly allowing themselves to be lied to?

    I'd say the liars are at fault, and those being lied to are victims.

    in response to Okay, okay, okay, fine, Ian, I didn't know all of this stuff, I didn't know people were misrepresenting Warren's history, I just didn't know, alright? I've just been repeating what people have said and what journalists and pundits who I've trusted in the past have said. You don't need to be so combative and hostile to everyone in your curiouscat who believes these misrepresentations; most of them share your values, and are just going by what they think they know to be true. You can't blame them for that.

    Ian replied:

    I don't blame people for being misinformed, but if you can't take 3 minutes to google the statement you're repeating you shouldn't be yelling it at an ally to question his lefty bona fides.

  17. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 11:39 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    "Zodiac is too conventional to be the meditation on obsession and unsolveability it wants to be"

    Why does it have to be unconvetional to tackle these themes?

    Ian replied:

    because a murder mystery with a lot of loose threads and uncertainty about whether they caught the right guy is unconventional

  18. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 10:42 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Okay, okay, okay, fine, Ian, I didn't know all of this stuff, I didn't know people were misrepresenting Warren's history, I just didn't know, alright? I've just been repeating what people have said and what journalists and pundits who I've trusted in the past have said.

    You don't need to be so combative and hostile to everyone in your curiouscat who believes these misrepresentations; most of them share your values, and are just going by what they think they know to be true. You can't blame them for that.

    in response to I've been disappointed recently by the anti-Bernie stance you've displayed recently on Twitter, especially because you are among my favorite leftist content creators. I even credit you for being the original push that radicalized me past standard liberalism. I'm really just looking for an explanation for this choice to fall into what I see as centrist liberal propaganda. I recognize you don't owe me one, but it would be appreciated. I have 2 big questions. 1) What is your reasoning for feeding into the "Bernie Bro" narrative? I take issue because not only does the term erase all the minority Bernie supporters, but it's also a narrative that is just blatantly false. I've seen much more harassment aimed at online Bernie supporters than the other way around, and then when the "Bros" respond (rather politely, often) they are blocked, and accused of harassing. And as to the point that white Bernie Bros lost HRC the 2016 election by voting for trump, stats show that more Clinton voters switched to McCain in 08 than Sanders to Trump in 16. He almost certainly should not be criticized for converting Rs to his camp. The whole Trump supporting Bro narrative just doesn't hold up. 2) What about Warren's policy makes her more attractive to you than Bernie's? She's weaker on M4A, wealth tax, public utilities, and has an absolutely horrid foreign policy platform, but she covers up for it with a lot of vague wordy statements that are characteristic of liberals pandering to left values. I really see her as an Obama 2.0 and that is not a compliment. Add in her troublesome past claiming to be a WoC, her previous Republican views, and her dishonesty with the recent "leaks" and all I see is an untrustworthy liberal candidate. I accept there is a possibility you're supporting her just due to your perception of Bernie's base, but I'm holding out hope that you're not that type of voter. Thanks for your time. Once again, not trying to be combative. Just asking.

    Ian replied:

    "You can't blame people for repeating falsehoods without checking if they're true." Bitch that's literally my job.

  19. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 10:00 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What's the game you've replayed the most times that isn't Monkey Island?

    Ian replied:

    LOOM

  20. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 9:53 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    I've been disappointed recently by the anti-Bernie stance you've displayed recently on Twitter, especially because you are among my favorite leftist content creators. I even credit you for being the original push that radicalized me past standard liberalism. I'm really just looking for an explanation for this choice to fall into what I see as centrist liberal propaganda. I recognize you don't owe me one, but it would be appreciated.

    I have 2 big questions.
    1) What is your reasoning for feeding into the "Bernie Bro" narrative? I take issue because not only does the term erase all the minority Bernie supporters, but it's also a narrative that is just blatantly false. I've seen much more harassment aimed at online Bernie supporters than the other way around, and then when the "Bros" respond (rather politely, often) they are blocked, and accused of harassing. And as to the point that white Bernie Bros lost HRC the 2016 election by voting for trump, stats show that more Clinton voters switched to McCain in 08 than Sanders to Trump in 16. He almost certainly should not be criticized for converting Rs to his camp. The whole Trump supporting Bro narrative just doesn't hold up.

    2) What about Warren's policy makes her more attractive to you than Bernie's? She's weaker on M4A, wealth tax, public utilities, and has an absolutely horrid foreign policy platform, but she covers up for it with a lot of vague wordy statements that are characteristic of liberals pandering to left values. I really see her as an Obama 2.0 and that is not a compliment. Add in her troublesome past claiming to be a WoC, her previous Republican views, and her dishonesty with the recent "leaks" and all I see is an untrustworthy liberal candidate. I accept there is a possibility you're supporting her just due to your perception of Bernie's base, but I'm holding out hope that you're not that type of voter.

    Thanks for your time. Once again, not trying to be combative. Just asking.

    Ian replied:

    The fact that you call the application of a healthy skepticism to Sanders - as I do to every other candidate - while still being quite enthusiastic about his platform an "anti-Bernie stance" is the exact problem I'm talking about.

    In answer to your extremely condescending questions:

    1) I have not once used the term "Bernie Bro." I don't buy the Bernie Bro narrative, and resent that you can't hear my concerns about his fandom without trying to fit me into it. I have not espoused any of the views you listed.

    2) I have said repeatedly what I like about Warren: she is, in many respects, stronger than Sanders on social issues. She has a stronger LGBT platform, a stronger women's platform, and has done more deliberate outreach to minority communities. She is indeed weaker on healthcare, wealth taxes, foreign policy, though by a narrower margin than people imply, but your comments about "vague wordy statements" and "liberal pandering" are empty gut feelings (which people always seem to feel about progressive women as soon as they run for higher office, and I can almost guarantee it's going to happen to AOC). The rest of what you've said is a string of blatant misrepresentations: Warren never once identified herself as Native American instead of white, she repeated what her grandma told her that she had Native ancestry because she thought it was true, it was never a core part of her self-presentation, and most you didn't even know she'd said it until Trump started being a racist about it. It was wrong of her to say without verifying, and she handled it wrong by doing a DNA test when that's not how most Natives conceive of race, and those are all serious, valid criticisms, but to rephrase that as "she lied about being a woman of color" is just dishonest. Claiming she's untrustworthy because she used to be a Republican is bullshit purity politics, she has decades of being one of the most progressive politicians in Washington, and half of Breadtube used to be edgelords, so drop it already. And calling these "leaks" lies when the Sanders camp has already confirmed that the conversation did take place, and Sanders did express exactly those concerns, and the disagreement is simply about how they were phrased, is, again, willful misrepresentation.

    I care about the truth being described accurately. I continue to support both candidates. I'm asking people to consider why they are clinging to these exaggerations and misrepresentations, and where these unquantifiable feelings about "untrustworthiness" and "pandering" come from, and whether any of this is rational, because - as I've said again and again - this kind of loyalty makes it HARDER to get the results we want out of politicians.

    And don't ever imply I'm a liberal again.

  21. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 9:51 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Are there any policy proposals from candidates that have already drop out of the presidential election that you would like to see picked up by other candidates and if so why?

    Ian replied:

    I seem to remember Harris was the one candidate who understood internet harassment, but I don't remember if she had any specific proposals.

  22. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 9:28 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Do you play a lot of metroidvanias?

    Having a blast with Hollow Knight and AM2R right now and was curious what your take on the subgenre was.

    in response to Been gaming much lately?

    Ian replied:

    Some. Hollow Knight was probably the best game I played last year. And I got a kick out of Gato Roboto.

    There's this minigenre of narrative-driven, not-quite Metroidvania, not-quite traditional platform games, like Cave Story and Aquaria, that I really like. Iconoclasts scratched that itch. I loved that game.

  23. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 3:53 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What is your favourite farm animal?

    Ian replied:

    do farms have turtles?

  24. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 2:49 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    I thought the reason you excluded references to contra from your video is because you disagreed with her including buck angel. But it turns out it was over wanting to avoid controversary. I know contra has been supportive of your work and she has shouted you out on chapo. But if shes your friend or just a colleague you like and support then include her, but dont exclude her out of a desire to avoid controversary.

    Ian replied:

    "wanting to avoid getting doxxed" is more accurate

  25. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 2:47 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    I’m really not a fan of the flaying Warren got but also - don’t you think “believe women” is a weird phrase to use here? It’s a term about the way systems ignore women when they report sexual assault, not a blanket statement applicable in every situation where a woman and a man have different accounts of a private encounter - especially when both of them are powerful and well-respected with a lot to lose and gain.

    in response to Its kinda disappointing to me how many people have gone full populist hero worship for sanders. Hasan called warren a snake, kyle kulinski said that bernie was infiltraded by the CIA. The "Bernie is the only one who can save us everyone else is against us" is just so tiring. Now i feel some sympathy for hillary supporters.

    Ian replied:

    "Believe women" has never meant women are always right and never lie, it is shorthand for the reality that false accusations are exceedingly rare and men in positions of power turning out to be misogynists is far more common, so when a woman accuses a man it should always be taken seriously. The man being sexist isn't always true, but it is always plausible.

    Given that all Warren said was Sanders didn't think a woman could win against Trump in 2020 - which would be more an indictment on the sexism of the American people than a statement about women - and the Sanders camp has already confirmed that, yes, they did have that conversation and he did raise those concerns but they disagree on the phrasing, this doesn't even count as an accusation.

    But imagine it had been. Imagine Warren said "Bernie Sanders told me he doesn't think a woman can lead." That's what a lot of people thought she was saying, and their immediate reflex was "she must be lying, Bernie wouldn't do that." And, yeah, that doesn't jive with my understanding of Bernie Sanders either, but that's how I felt about Franken and Ellison, and this would be a way smaller transgression. And tThis whole "an old white man I've never met cannot possibly have a sexist bone in his body so I will attack the woman who implied it and call her a liar" is irrational. It just is. I saw a lot of people who championed "believe women" during #MeToo do the exact opposite here, with zero awareness, and over something so trivial, because this time it was a man they were invested in. "Bernie wouldn't say something sexist." They can ALWAYS say something sexist.

    And I'm not even saying it would be true, just that you could not possibly know it isn't.

    That's the irrational loyalty I'm talking about.

  26. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 2:12 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    I've never understood the "electoral college prevents mob rule" argument conservatives like to trot out. Is it suppose to even make sense at all?

    Ian replied:

    (re: the electoral college)

    There is a kernel of a valid concern there.

    OK, so take a state like Wyoming. Wyoming has the lowest population of the 50 states. The people of Wyoming have needs unique to their state; for one, Wyoming is like 50% national parks; it has one of the larger Indian reservations.

    The concern is that, if voting was purely a matter of popular vote, politicians would propose policies that benefit the most populous regions, which are major metropolitan areas. New York City and Los Angeles would have a huge amount of influence. And the policies that are good for NYC and LA have little to do with what Wyoming needs. Not a lot of federal land and Indian reservations in big cities.

    So, the thinking goes, the electoral college, by inflating the importance of the less-populated states, compels politicians to represent all 50 states, not just the ones with lots of people in them.

    Of course, that's not how it actually works. Since all a state's electoral college votes go to whomever wins the local election, even by a tiny margin, all the college does is switch focus from densely-populated states to swing states. Wyoming is neither, so it still gets the shaft.

    Too much of the conversation about electoral college vs. popular vote boils down to

    R: "what about flyover states?"
    D: "the electoral college doesn't actually benefit flyover states"
    R: "la la I'm not listening"

    and no one ever really addresses how either system will deal with states like Wyoming.

  27. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 1:28 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    The issue I have with Warren and her supporters is that they are representative of this White Professional Managerial Well educated "progressive" form of politics. This sort of politics is deeply artificial and ultimately reactionary in nature. I support Sanders because he has working class politics and this is reflected in his support base in both donor statistics and in polling. This sort of politics will hopefully realign things in America in a way that is more conducive toward creating socialism.

    Ian replied:

    none of what you just said is politics

  28. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 4:52 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Then what s your favorite serial-killer/murder mystery/detective movie then? Or do you prefer watching all of Alfred Hitchcock's works? Do you still find Hitchcock's works compelling over time?

    What is it about Zodiac you didn't liked?

    in response to Memories of Murder or Zodiac?

    Ian replied:

    Brick and Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. I'm more into noirs than whodunnits, though both are good.

    Zodiac is too conventional to be the meditation on obsession and unsolveability it wants to be but too slow and digressive to be good pulp. I wouldn't say I dislike it but I don't feel it entirely works.

  29. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 3:59 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Who's gonna win Genesis 7?

    Ian replied:

    me

  30. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 3:59 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Do you think I'm a bad person if I don't do these things? I have a tremendously difficult time just getting through day-to-day life and I know there's more that I should be doing but I just... don't do it.

    in response to So when you say that “I” have to do things are you talking about shifting the conversation? I sometimes feel like it’s pointless to follow electoral politics because I can’t do anything about except for voting every 4 years in a system where it won’t even count because I don’t live in a swing state. So is it just about social pressure and collective action or something?

    Ian replied:

    Hey, I'm a leftist. "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need." If your ability is lower, you do less. That's the deal. The rest of us are here to fill in. If, in meeting your own needs, you find a little excess energy now and then, maybe make a phone call or two.

    The movement needs you healthy.

  31. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 3:27 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Well, I don't "stan" either candidate, I just think Warren is the second best of a bad bunch. I think electing Sanders would be more sound primarily because he has a history of sticking by his principles and has been consistently advocating and voting for the same things all throughout his career.

    I agree with you, in general, that politics isn't a fandom, and that relying on politicians to solve our problems is a terrible idea. I'm a revolutionary anarchist. I don't support this system. I support voting in principled people who will make dismantling this system easier, or at least not harder. To that end, I see more promise in Sanders than Warren.

    in response to So, for the record, I'm not treating Warren voters like shit-- I think they're wrong, but whatever, they're entitled to their vote, and I'll vote for Warren if she wins the nomination. I'm also not going to try and filibuster to you about why I think Sanders is the better candidate, it's clear your mind's made up, and trying to change it as an anonymous stranger on the internet isn't any of my business. Anyway, my actual question is, what do you think should be done to bridge the gap between the Sanders and Warren camps?

    Ian replied:

    "advocating and voting for the same things all throughout his career" is bullshit

    two months before he proposed his immigration reform plan that would abolish ICE he was saying we absolutely *have* to have strong borders, no way around it

    in his 2016 campaign he had basically no plan whatsoever for dealing with police brutality until Black Lives Matter started disrupting his talks to demand one

    Bernie has had multiple major, public about-faces in extremely recent memory

    the fact his fans believe it never happens means either when he shifts his position they retcon him into having always had it, or they just don't pay attention to them because social issues don't count and only the economy matters

    I'm not going to have the "flip-flopper" debate again, it was shit when the Republicans used it against Kerry and it's shit now

    politicians moving further left throughout their careers in response to pressure from their constituencies IS A GOOD THING and one of Sanders strongest selling points

    but to embrace this about him they would have to admit that a) he still has flaws, and b) Warren having moved left throughout her career is also a good thing

    but we can't have that so we pretend that somehow he's both "the candidate who listens to us" AND "the candidate who will never move on anything no matter what we say"

    fucking awesome

  32. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 3:25 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Been gaming much lately?

    Ian replied:

    yeah, I'm playing Even the Ocean and Dead Cells

  33. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 3:12 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    So when you say that “I” have to do things are you talking about shifting the conversation?

    I sometimes feel like it’s pointless to follow electoral politics because I can’t do anything about except for voting every 4 years in a system where it won’t even count because I don’t live in a swing state.

    So is it just about social pressure and collective action or something?

    in response to So, for the record, I'm not treating Warren voters like shit-- I think they're wrong, but whatever, they're entitled to their vote, and I'll vote for Warren if she wins the nomination. I'm also not going to try and filibuster to you about why I think Sanders is the better candidate, it's clear your mind's made up, and trying to change it as an anonymous stranger on the internet isn't any of my business. Anyway, my actual question is, what do you think should be done to bridge the gap between the Sanders and Warren camps?

    Ian replied:

    No.

    Join an activist group that lobbies politicians. Join phone trees that call them. Join fundraising groups that help smaller candidates that the DNC ignores. Find an issue that matters to you and volunteer with a group that supports it. Go to protests. Join boycotts. Sponsor an immigrant. Donate clothes to a refugee. Shut down an airport when they try to deport people.

    Don't stop at "shifting the conversation." Do the work.

  34. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 3:11 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What are your thoughts on Hasan Minhaj? Personally, after the guy managed to leave JUSTIN TRUDEAU speechless in an interview by asking the hard questions, I am quite willing to call that man a comrade

    Ian replied:

    I liked his comedy special. Haven't watched his show yet.

  35. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 3:11 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Its kinda disappointing to me how many people have gone full populist hero worship for sanders. Hasan called warren a snake, kyle kulinski said that bernie was infiltraded by the CIA. The "Bernie is the only one who can save us everyone else is against us" is just so tiring. Now i feel some sympathy for hillary supporters.

    Ian replied:

    Watching "take women seriously when they accuse men" morph into "if a woman says Bernie has said anything even passingly sexist ever she is a serial liar and the avatar of the liberals' appropriation of identity politics to attack the left" made me take a four day weekend from Twitter.

    "Believe women" unless they criticize a man you happen to like, then flaying her is PRAXIS.

  36. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 3:03 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Huh. How anyone could be inspired by Hillary is beyond me.

    2016 was so awful.

    in response to I’m a pretty recent convert to leftism and I didn’t realize anything was different until I saw this. Did Leftists stan Hillary?

    Ian replied:

    Hillary was to Obama's left on a number of issues and people were inspired by him.

  37. Published on Jan 23, 2020, 12:04 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    I’m a pretty recent convert to leftism and I didn’t realize anything was different until I saw this.

    Did Leftists stan Hillary?

    in response to Do you think political stan culture has gotten worse, or just one of the things that have become more visible because of the internet? I feel like there's a shift from the reverence and hero worship that Presidents like JFK, Reagan and Obama get to the culture around Warren, Sanders, and even Clinton (centrist stanning!), but I'm not sure. (Both cultures are bad)

    Ian replied:

    Most didn't, but many at large did. She was the first female candidate from one of the two main parties. That was always going to inspire some people.

  38. Published on Jan 22, 2020, 2:06 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    I donno there are already some voices on twitter advocating a "red/brown alliance"

    in response to how likely would right wingers try to ally themselves with Bernie if only to try to give credence to the notion Nazis were socialists

    Ian replied:

    there always is, but - and I can't believe I have to say this - the Nazis are not going to vote for a Jewish man

  39. Published on Jan 22, 2020, 1:59 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What's your ring size?

    Ian replied:

    medium

  40. Published on Jan 22, 2020, 1:57 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Do you think political stan culture has gotten worse, or just one of the things that have become more visible because of the internet? I feel like there's a shift from the reverence and hero worship that Presidents like JFK, Reagan and Obama get to the culture around Warren, Sanders, and even Clinton (centrist stanning!), but I'm not sure.

    (Both cultures are bad)

    in response to So, for the record, I'm not treating Warren voters like shit-- I think they're wrong, but whatever, they're entitled to their vote, and I'll vote for Warren if she wins the nomination. I'm also not going to try and filibuster to you about why I think Sanders is the better candidate, it's clear your mind's made up, and trying to change it as an anonymous stranger on the internet isn't any of my business. Anyway, my actual question is, what do you think should be done to bridge the gap between the Sanders and Warren camps?

    Ian replied:

    I think irrational loyalty is a byproduct of sincere passion. When people are genuinely inspired by a platform, some percentage are going to over-invest themselves in the candidate. We've seen this on the Right my whole life; if you saw the movie Jesus Camp, they have a room full of kids praying to cardboard cutout of George W. Bush. And don't get me started on Reagan.

    We haven't seen it as much on the Left because too often the Democrats run people who don't inspire even mild admiration, let alone passion. No one was going to circle the wagons if you criticized Al Gore. But I saw this with Nader in the 2000 election, I saw it with Obama, and I'm seeing it now with Sanders and Warren. (Sanders somewhat moreso.)

    It's because they are more popular, more politically viable, and more genuinely exciting, which are all good things. But, in our mass media, image-centric, cult-of-personality celebrity culture, they are breeding grounds for stans.

  41. Published on Jan 22, 2020, 7:08 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Should people try to play the angle with their R senators that it is unfair to Donald Trump not to have a trial to clear his name more

    Ian replied:

    I would caution against trying to back Republicans into rhetorical traps, they make up the rhetoric as they go and do not care about being consistent

  42. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 9:42 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    So, for the record, I'm not treating Warren voters like shit-- I think they're wrong, but whatever, they're entitled to their vote, and I'll vote for Warren if she wins the nomination. I'm also not going to try and filibuster to you about why I think Sanders is the better candidate, it's clear your mind's made up, and trying to change it as an anonymous stranger on the internet isn't any of my business.

    Anyway, my actual question is, what do you think should be done to bridge the gap between the Sanders and Warren camps?

    in response to The progressive vote was already split between Sanders and Warren to begin with, though.

    Ian replied:

    All due respect, but I find in PHENOMENALLY frustrating that I spend all this time discussing the strengths and weaknesses I see in both candidates and keep saying how awesome we should find it that two politicians are trying to out-progressive each other for our votes, and still get shuffled into the "Warren Stan" box because Warren Stan and Bernie Stan are the only options people can conceive of.

    I am a nobody stan. I think stanning politicians is a terrible idea. I think the trust of their constituency is the greatest weapon a politician possesses and it should never be given to them completely. Once a person is elected your job as a citizen is to have an adversarial relationship with them, to pressure them on their weaknesses and make the most of their strengths. Politics is not a fucking fandom.

    I see both Warren and Sanders as compromise candidates far, far to the center of where I want this country to go, but considerably to the left of their competition, so they are who I can get the best results out of. I can get the results I want out of either one but, in either case, it will be work. If Sanders were President, I would have to push him to be stronger on social issues (and deal with his fans telling me that stuff doesn't matter). I would also have to see if his uncompromising nature actually gets bills through Congress. If Warren were President, I would have to push her to be stronger on economic issues, and to not compromise too early or easily on getting her bills through Congress (or to assume that Republicans will respect a willingness to compromise). I'd also have to make sure her social policies were as intersectional as I want them to be.

    This is the work. This is what democracy is.

    How do you bridge the gap between the Sanders and Warren camps? Stop having camps.

  43. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 9:31 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Why do people mock the idea of advocating for more female CEOs?

    I understand that a lot of people are pushing for a society which would not overpay CEOs at the expense of other workers, but isn't less female CEOs still an unjust power imbalance?

    Ian replied:

    People are mocking the idea that "more female CEOs" is a solution to sexism and inequality, not the idea of women having bigger and better paying jobs. But that nuance does often fall out of their criticisms, and it can leave a back door open for sexists.

  44. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 9:30 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Memories of Murder or Zodiac?

    Ian replied:

    I haven't seen Memories of Murder but I love Bong Joon-ho and was never that impressed with Zodiac, so Memories of Murder.

  45. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 3:27 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    The progressive vote was already split between Sanders and Warren to begin with, though.

    in response to How likely is it that Biden wins the primary because Sanders and Warren bicker till the bitter end

    Ian replied:

    yes, and the strategy for either one is to collect votes from the other. each pack treating the other like shit makes that harder, get it?

  46. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 2:38 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    how likely would right wingers try to ally themselves with Bernie if only to try to give credence to the notion Nazis were socialists

    Ian replied:

    ok I usually respond to questions like these with "I don't predict the future" but lol, no, that's not going to happen

  47. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 2:38 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    How likely is it that Biden wins the primary because Sanders and Warren bicker till the bitter end

    Ian replied:

    I don't predict the future, and the "bickering" is largely media/fanbase spin, but I do have a genuine fear that they're going to split the left/progressive vote and Biden's going to win because of it. I don't think either can get the nom without collecting some of the other's constituency and the acrimony between the two camps is going to make that hard.

  48. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 2:35 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    I'm curious, why have you seen clips of funny games on YouTube? Also you should watch some of his movies there great.

    in response to "I haven't seen any Michael Haneke all the way through." Do you just stop watching halfway through?

    Ian replied:

    I referenced the movie in a video, and ended up watching a bunch of bits of it looking for the right clip of Michael Pitt breaking the fourth wall. And then probably YouTube was like "hey, you seem into clips of this movie" and kept recommending them and I probably said "sure, why not" a few times.

  49. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 2:34 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Is it ok for anyone to use characters in their fiction works as their mouthpiece for their personal opinions?

    Ian replied:

    that's not up to me

  50. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 2:33 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Why wont Biden leave

    Ian replied:

    because he's in the lead?

  51. Published on Jan 21, 2020, 4:25 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    "I haven't seen any Michael Haneke all the way through." Do you just stop watching halfway through?

    Ian replied:

    I've mostly just seen clips from Funny Games on YouTube

  52. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 4:19 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Does it ever worry you that arguments against voting seem to come primarily from people on the left?

    Ian replied:

    I think the vast majority of people who don't vote don't make arguments for it, they just aren't invested in voting. The lefties who refuse to vote on principal are at least coming from a place of sincere criticism, even if I think their conclusion is nonsense, and I don't see that they have that much influence on politics at large. So... enh.

  53. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 4:00 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Does the deterioration of a demographic's economic conditions contribute to thier susceptibility to bigotry?

    Is such a thing causally provable? I've seen a lot of hand wringing on this topic lately and was curious.

    Ian replied:

    it's... complicated.

    when things get bad, those in power will blame society's problems on The Other. this can be economic conditions, cultural shifts, war, or any number of issues. how susceptible the public is to these arguments seems to vary a lot from culture to culture; the US has a very complicated relationship to its history of slavery and genocide of native peoples, which I think make white Americans particularly susceptible to bigoted arguments.

    as I've said in my videos, economic precarity is not a cause of bigotry so much as it's one thing bigotry can be sold as a solution to. but, yes, bigotry can increase if your quality of life is threatened.

  54. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 3:56 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What do you think of this video? https://twitter.com/Ad_Inifinitum/status/1218926576441733121

    in response to How did Buttigieg get so popular

    Ian replied:

    *chef's kiss*

  55. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 3:31 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    that's an odd way of spelling macramé

    in response to What is your favourite artform?

    Ian replied:

    that's an odd way of spelling papier-mâché

  56. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 2:01 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What is your favourite artform?

    Ian replied:

    picking favorites is for fools

  57. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 2:01 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    I understand if you don't want to speculate on someone else's motives, but do you think the devs ever intended to have an actual message/specific satire and was "neutered" after RW gamer reactions, or was it always just going to be a complete void in provocative clothing to generate some press?

    I remember more than a little speculation on the former, but it's not like Far Cry 3 or 4 were particularly deep or incisive.

    in response to What, to you, is art that "says nothing"? In my view, every piece of art says something. It seems like when artists claim to say nothing, either the thing they're saying is of little to no substance, or they are denying that their art says anything (for whatever reason). For example, Detroit Become Human is definitely a malformed civil rights/holocaust allegory, but David Cage has an ulterior motive for denying that, so he claims the game says nothing except "what if Blade Runner, but bad."

    Ian replied:

    I'm sure there were people on the team who came up with things to say at various points in production, but by Far Cry 5 they must have known it was never going to make it into the finished product.

  58. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 1:59 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Do you ever feel completely overwhelmed with good stuff to watch/play/read?

    I collect huge lists and end up just feeling exhausted looking at it and just go find something I have already experienced.

    Ian replied:

    enh. sometimes? like, I don't know if something's actually good until I'm actually experiencing it, so sometimes I feel overwhelmed by my steam library or my bookshelf, but I don't know how much of it is actually worth my time. I rarely feel like "damn, there's too much good stuff," just "damn, there's a lot of stuff."

  59. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 1:57 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Are you married?

    Ian replied:

    nope

    you gonna ask for my ring size next?

  60. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 1:23 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    At what point do plotholes interrupt your enjoyment of a movie?

    Ian replied:

    depends on the movie, depends on the plot hole

  61. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 1:22 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Where do you see yourself in five years?

    Ian replied:

    fam I dunno where I'm gonna be in five days

  62. Published on Jan 20, 2020, 1:22 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Were you always politically engaged, or did you become so only relatively recently?

    Ian replied:

    it's bee a gradual process of becoming more engaged the older I get. I think 9/11 was the first time it felt like not caring about politics was no longer an option, though I wouldn't say I engaged very effectively at the time

  63. Published on Jan 19, 2020, 10:41 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What, to you, is art that "says nothing"?

    In my view, every piece of art says something. It seems like when artists claim to say nothing, either the thing they're saying is of little to no substance, or they are denying that their art says anything (for whatever reason). For example, Detroit Become Human is definitely a malformed civil rights/holocaust allegory, but David Cage has an ulterior motive for denying that, so he claims the game says nothing except "what if Blade Runner, but bad."

    in response to Do you really think it's cowardly to ask questions without having a specific message in mind. Do you want all art to just reinforce your own political opinions. I think the best art is the ones left to interpretation.

    Ian replied:

    Fair. I suppose I mean art that means nothing on purpose, only by accident. Errant Signal did a great video on how, by trying so hard not to take a stand on anything, Far Cry 5 actually makes some very bad, unintentional statements.

    https://youtu.be/5EPqF_o4mCs

  64. Published on Jan 19, 2020, 10:36 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    That does not mean that it doesn't say anything. It just means that it largely depends on your own interpretation. Instead of someone just telling you what to think.

    in response to Do you really think it's cowardly to ask questions without having a specific message in mind. Do you want all art to just reinforce your own political opinions. I think the best art is the ones left to interpretation.

    Ian replied:

    pssssst

    having a clear message is not telling your audience what to think

    it's telling them what *you* think and risking that they might disagree with you

  65. Published on Jan 19, 2020, 10:34 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Would you watch "John Wick: The Teenage Years"?

    Ian replied:

    that sounds like a terrible idea

  66. Published on Jan 19, 2020, 10:34 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    (Different anon) Do you think 'One Week' deserves to be BNL's best-known song? It kind of annoys me that it's what they're famous for when it's not even the best song on 'Stunt.'

    in response to What was the first album you ever bought

    Ian replied:

    enh. it's rare for a band's best-known song to be their best song.

  67. Published on Jan 18, 2020, 2:37 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What was the first album you ever bought

    in response to What's the newest album you've listened to? Give it a review!

    Ian replied:

    I bought Barenaked Ladies' Stunt and The Offspring's Americana on the same trip.

  68. Published on Jan 18, 2020, 2:35 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Do you really think it's cowardly to ask questions without having a specific message in mind. Do you want all art to just reinforce your own political opinions. I think the best art is the ones left to interpretation.

    Ian replied:

    I would much rather watch art that contradicted my political opinions than art that says nothing.

  69. Published on Jan 18, 2020, 5:17 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    "...But I know some of his stuff wades into pretty heavy territory..."

    What do you mean heavy territory? You mean politically?

    in response to Michael Haneke once quote: "An artist is someone who should raise questions rather than give answers. I have no message." Do you agree with Michael Haneke? Especially if you've seen any of his films

    Ian replied:

    More that they tend to be very bleak and deal a lot with violence and cruelty. Which are, of course, deeply political.

  70. Published on Jan 17, 2020, 11:26 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    For what it's worth, I appreciate hearing your answers and the fact that you seem to be one of the only people on I've seen on Twitter lately who hasn't made some kind of conspiratorial claim about how Warren's trying to help Biden win the election.

    in response to Are you tired of people asking you questions about Elizabeth Warren?

    Ian replied:

    Thanks. I just feel like politics - and politicians - are complex but primary season demands simple narratives, and even smart people lose sight of that complexity. They need Bernie to be The Only One Who Can Fix Things, instead of being a candidate with a somewhat leftier economic plan than his nearest competitor and a somewhat weaker stance on some social issues, and people need to behave as if that's a binary you have to choose between when there's no reason both candidates can't be strong in both arenas.

    It's just depressing.

  71. Published on Jan 17, 2020, 10:19 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    So with what Thought Slime said about neoiberal vs very liberal I am curious.

    Is Parasite neoliberal or very liberal?

    Ian replied:

    honestly, it's probably just regular liberal

  72. Published on Jan 17, 2020, 10:19 PM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Do you think The Dark Knight was pro or anti Bush?

    Ian replied:

    Like most superhero movies, it alluded to politics to appear topical but made no concrete statements so you could feel whatever beliefs you came in with were reflected in the film.

    So, both, and neither.

  73. Published on Jan 17, 2020, 1:02 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    Would the video game studio you founded be named Innuendo Studios?

    in response to What would you name yourself if you were an indie game designer

    Ian replied:

    that was the original intent behind the name Innuendo Studios. I picked it when I was trying to make adventure games.

  74. Published on Jan 17, 2020, 1:01 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    What if the ESRB established an accessibility standard as a part of its ranking, all it'd do is put an X on the box next to the general rating when it fails to meet a minimum standard of accommodation.

    Ian replied:

    dunno how helpful an X would be. there's a lot of different kinds of accessibility, and "meets the minimum" doesn't necessarily tell you if it meets *your* needs. but ESRB ratings tend to include a list of things that earned a game its rating, so it would be pretty easy to list the accessibility features as well.

  75. Published on Jan 17, 2020, 1:00 AM

    A

    Anonymous commented:

    is there a list of actual physical violence the alt right has commited?

    Ian replied:

    I think I've heard of such a thing, but the website itself escapes me. google would probably turn something up.

Anon commented:
Ian replied:

CuriousCat is an anonymous Q&A social networking site. It is set to be discontinued on Oct 7, 2024.

This is an archive of the 15094 questions and answers from my CuriousCat page.

Previous Next

Site Credit: Arpit Agrawal